When comparing Padrino vs Pyramid, the Slant community recommends Pyramid for most people. In the question“What are the best backend web frameworks?” Pyramid is ranked 15th while Padrino is ranked 43rd. The most important reason people chose Pyramid is:
Pyramid can be used for creating small applications quickly and easily, but it also powers up large enterprise-scale applications such as Dropbox.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Ruby framework based on Sinatra - with extra features
Padrino is as fast as Sinatra, but extra features are added to this framework. They include namespaced route aliases, nested routes, controllers, a mailer system, unified logging and a lot more.
Pro Open source
Padrino is open-source.
Pro Very flexible
Pyramid can be used for creating small applications quickly and easily, but it also powers up large enterprise-scale applications such as Dropbox.
Pro Persistence agnostic
Either NoSQL and SQL (including SQLAlchemy plugin).
Pro Comes with security included
Includes authorization and authentication with multiple backends.
Cons
Con The great number of options it offers can become intimidating
One of Pyramid's greatest drawbacks is that it requires a lot of set up in the beginning of a project. This can feel overwhelming and can keep people away from using it.