Common Lisp vs V
When comparing Common Lisp vs V, the Slant community recommends Common Lisp for most people. In the question“What are the best languages to learn for someone coming from Python?” Common Lisp is ranked 5th while V is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Common Lisp is:
Almost all aspects of the language are designed with interactive/repl use in mind.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Carefully designed for interactive use
Almost all aspects of the language are designed with interactive/repl use in mind.
Pro Very Powerful REPL with SLIME
SLIME (Superior Lisp Interaction Mode for Emacs).
Pro Condition/restart system
It is easy to recover from errors. Error resolution can be determined by the user at the REPL.
Pro Image based runtime
The state of the program may be saved and reloaded as an image, supporting safer modification of the running program. New code may be compiled into the image as the program runs, while late binding ensures that symbol redefinitions take effect throughout the program.
Pro Almost as fast as, or faster than, C
Some compilers such as SBCL can be faster than C or other low-level languages, and most compilers can generate fast native code.
Pro Cross-platform
Compile app to run on different OSes.
Pro Sum types
V has sum types.
Pro GUI support
V comes with (simple) GUI support out of the box.
Pro Clear syntax
Highly understandable language.
Pro Safety
V is very safe.
Pro Fast like C
V is easier than C and fast like C.
Pro Closures
V has closures, which gives the user additional options and usefulness.
Pro Generics
V has generics.
Pro Supports concurrency and channels
Can run functions concurrently that communicate over channels.
Pro C Interop
Can import C libraries, structs, and headers.
Pro Fast compile times
Compiles programs fast, less waiting around, so more productive and fun.
Pro Lambdas
Supports using lambdas, which helps write more concise code without having to use so many lines.