When comparing jam.py vs Falcon, the Slant community recommends jam.py for most people. In the question“What are the best Python web frameworks for creating a CRUD application?” jam.py is ranked 4th while Falcon is ranked 7th. The most important reason people chose jam.py is:
No need to learn huge 'Djangoish' frameworks. Easy to deploy with Apache, small deployment footprint. Security built in the App.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Clean and simple Application Builder, easy to learn and get results fast
No need to learn huge 'Djangoish' frameworks. Easy to deploy with Apache, small deployment footprint. Security built in the App.
Pro Great for non-developers looking to visualize data
You can get productive with jam.py really quick even if you have little to no development experience. A dashboard can be built pretty quickly with minimal effort.
Pro Built to build REST APIs
Falcon is designed entirely around building REST APIs. It achieves this helps a lot with it being lightweight and simple. It also helps developers take some design choices which would otherwise not be possible with a more general-purpose framework,
Pro Lightweight with minimal dependencies
Falcon is a very lightweight framework. This can be noticed simply by looking at the dependency list: other than the python standard library, six and mimeparse are the only dependencies.
Pro Performance is really awesome
Cons
Con Still need to learn Python etc to get the full potential of Jam.py
General Python, JS, etc. knowledge is still needed to fully take advantage of Jam.py.
Con Limited in scope
Being designed around building REST APIs and the fact that it's minimalistic with very few dependencies makes Falcon opinionated (you should build a REST API) and limited in scope (you shouldn't be using Falcon to build a news site, blog or ecommerce platform).