When comparing Chromely vs Quasar Framework, the Slant community recommends Quasar Framework for most people. In the question“What are the best Electron alternatives for cross-platform app development using web technologies?” Quasar Framework is ranked 2nd while Chromely is ranked 13th. The most important reason people chose Quasar Framework is:
Vue 3.x available as a plugin.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Build .NET HTML desktop apps without Node or NPM
Pro Build .NET HTML Chromium CefSharp/CefGlue desktop apps without WinForms or WPF
Pro With Chromely you can build cross-platform desktops using .NET Core
Pro No third-party language translation is required for Chromely
To use Electron in .NET or .NET Core, you will require libraries like Edge.js, Bridge.NET or host Electron in ASP.NET NET like what is used in Electron.NET. No third-party language translation is required for Chromely. It requires just pure C#/VB code.
Pro Uses Vue.js 2.0
Vue 3.x available as a plugin.
Pro Good documentation and coding samples
Pro Massive suite of well test & optimized widgets
Instant rebuild for SPA, PWA, Cordova or Electron with Material/iOS Themes.
Pro Designed from the outset for desktop & mobile
Pro Can build/test your PWA with/without PWA wrapper
Pro Supports server side rendering (SSR) like Nuxt + SSR/PWA
"Icon genie" builds app icons and splash images for platforms selected.
Pro Ability to add custom server side code when using SSR
Cons
Con Chromely is only for .NET/.NET Core development
Con Developed by a single person
Statistically, apps being developed by a single person can be gone without warning.