When comparing nano.do vs is.gd, the Slant community recommends nano.do for most people. In the question“What are the best URL shorteners?” nano.do is ranked 11th while is.gd is ranked 35th. The most important reason people chose nano.do is:
It's way easier to share in the real world a friendly link instead of a random one, even if it's shorter.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Pretty interesting what they do with the words!
It's way easier to share in the real world a friendly link instead of a random one, even if it's shorter.
Pro Links last forever
The links created by is.gd will never be deleted down the road, meaning you can continue to use them years down the road without worry.
Pro 19 characters long
Including the "https://" at the start of links, short links are typically 19 characters long (so 11 characters plus the https://).
Cons
Con It's a project in the very first stages, but it's promising!
Con No central location to see all your links
If you want to see data for your short links, you will have to visit each link individually and adding a dash (-) at the end of the link, or enabling automatic previews.