When comparing Duplicati vs TeraCopy, the Slant community recommends Duplicati for most people. In the question“What are the best GS RichCopy 360 alternatives for Windows? ” Duplicati is ranked 1st while TeraCopy is ranked 2nd.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Free
Pro Open Source
Pro Cross-platform support (Windows, Linux, macOS)
Pro Works with standard protocols and many services
FTP, SSH, WebDAV as well as popular services like Microsoft OneDrive, Amazon Cloud Drive & S3, Google Drive, box.com, Mega, hubiC and many others.
Pro Simple interface
Pro Faster file deletion
It deletes files much much faster than built in Windows file manager.
Pro Can check files for copy errors
TeraCopy can automatically check/verify the copied files for errors, by calculating their CRC or other checksum/hash value.
Pro Seamless shell integration
Pro Skips badly copied files
TeraCopy skips badly copied files during the copying process, and then displays them at the end of the transfer "Verify" with checksum/hash, so you can see which files to re-copy. See also, OpenHashTab for Windows and DeadHash for Windows, Linux, Android.
Cons
Con Doesn't support imaging
Con File backup program which is not intended for system restore
Con Sometimes clashes with 7 zip
From my experience, TeraCopy does not do well in conjunction with 7zips.
It seems to error on some systems when you do a drag-and-drop extract.