When comparing RemNote vs Logseq, the Slant community recommends Logseq for most people. In the question“What is the best cross-platform note-taking app?” Logseq is ranked 22nd while RemNote is ranked 61st. The most important reason people chose Logseq is:
Logseq is a privacy-first tool for thought.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Easily create flashcards and practice with spaced repetition
Pro Free version has most features
Pro Perpetual license available, with a offline-first promise
Pro Has a single pricing plan instead of tiers
Pro Offer mobile and web version, make study on the go possible
Pro Offline-first implementation on mobile and desktop
Pro Each Rem can be focused, zoomed, and made into document easily
Pro Outline structure allows speedy thinking
Pro Privacy-first
Logseq is a privacy-first tool for thought.
Pro Networked notes
Similar to Roam's technique of letting the notes flow with links to each other.
Pro Local-first software
Every topic is its own flat file. Nothing is better than keeping your data in the file system with an option of git source control or online backup.
https://www.inkandswitch.com/local-first/
Pro Daily journal is capture on Steriods
The daily journal feature allows you to quickly capture disparate topics under today's date and by way of tags make things organized and findable from any topic page.
Pro Open source
Logseq is opensource.
Pro Structured data over willy-nilly formatting
Lots of apps are too graphically flexible in how they allow content to be entered, placed, and formatted. They act like Word when what you want when authoring content is Markdown. Content and semantic structure, not graphical frills.
Pro Org syntax
Logseq support Emacs Org syntax out of the box.
Cons
Con Locked in the system with rather lackluster export feature
Even though data can be stored locally, they are encrypted proprietary format and can be really messy to export.
Con Nice features like graph view and image occlusion are limited in quota and only available behind paywall
Image occlusion, portal, PDF, etc. functions have a quota for free plan user, and are fully available only after subscribing.
Con Animation can be a tiny bit unsmooth and laggy
Con Limited amount of plugins
Con Pricing is rather high
Con Keyboard-driven editing/navigating is descent but average
It is only because I was a long-time Checkvist user that I say this. Checkvist has keyboard-driven controls which are in a league of their own.
Con Still in Alpha
Logseq is still in Alpha and is under heavy development.