When comparing UXPin vs Keynote, the Slant community recommends Keynote for most people. In the question“What are the best mockup and wireframing tools for websites?” Keynote is ranked 24th while UXPin is ranked 31st. The most important reason people chose Keynote is:
Can import all kinds of assets (images, videos, PDFs, sounds) into mockup without hassle.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro UXPin has great advanced features for prototyping
integration if this then dop that and custom javascript functionality
Pro Actively developed
UXPin is constantly being updated with new features.
Pro Import from PhotoShop and Sketch
A pro UXPin account will allow you to import existing projects from PhotoShop or Sketch.
Pro Extensive library of elements and patterns
UXPin offers elements from a wide range libraries. This includes responsive frameworks such as Bootstrap and Foundation, and libraries specific to mobile prototyping.
Pro Imports nearly every type of asset
Can import all kinds of assets (images, videos, PDFs, sounds) into mockup without hassle.
Pro Animations and transitions
Keynote currently is one of the very few tools that supports animation of elements and transition of views without programming.
Pro Text Styles makes it easy to create typography systems
Pro Smart Snaps
Keynote has alignment grids (aka snap to grid feature) that snaps to end, midpoints, baselines etc of objects and grids. They are super useful when you want to follow a structured layout for your wireframe.
Cons
Con Expensive subscription model
$29 per user/mo ($350 pa) will soon rack up compared to a standalone product like Axure PRO ($450) which has a license that lasts years (they have given out free updates for the last 2 versions).
Con Steep learning curve
UXPin is one of the more complex prototyping tools. Combined with a lack of documentation, it can be discouraging for first time users.