When comparing Chocolat vs Coda, the Slant community recommends Coda for most people. In the question“What are the best programming text editors for a Mac with a GUI?” Coda is ranked 19th while Chocolat is ranked 20th. The most important reason people chose Coda is:
Makes styling a site in CSS simpler.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Built-in access to MDN
Chocolat offers integrated web-based documentation, so you can quickly look up anything you might need clarification on.
Pro Unlimited split viewing
Chocolat allows you to view as many files side-by-side as you'd like, rather than limiting you to two.
Pro Live error checking
Chocolat supports live error checking.
Pro Great look
The native Mac looks awesome.
Pro Excellent theme support
Themes can be tweaked in various ways, such as in terms of font-size, colors, and highlighting colors.
Pro Code completion
Chocolat will auto-complete JS variables, keywords, methods, functions, and parameters.
Pro Live Preview mode
Makes styling a site in CSS simpler.
Pro Built-in FTP client
Publishing your changes to the web server is a one-click operation. That is, one click per file, or one click for all your changed files. Or even cherry-pick the files to be published in the next batch.
Pro Built-in support for Git and Subversion
Although the software doesn't ship with these libraries, it does work once you have one installed.
Pro Mature
Coda has been developed by Panic exclusively for Mac since 2007. The experience of the developers shows in the stability and polish of their product.
Pro Many plugins available
There is a huge library of user-created plugins, ranging from additional syntax modes, to code validation and beautification, to reference materials, code snippets, text actions and more.
Cons
Con Mac only
Chocolate is only available for Mac.
Con Commercial
Con Hasn't been updated in 2 years.
Con Expensive
The price of $99 is more than many other editors.