When comparing Battle Worlds: Kronos vs EA Sports UFC 2, the Slant community recommends EA Sports UFC 2 for most people. In the question“What are the best cross-platform PC/Android games?” EA Sports UFC 2 is ranked 35th while Battle Worlds: Kronos is ranked 41st. The most important reason people chose EA Sports UFC 2 is:
They did a great job with the graphics on this one. EA really wanted to fighters to look and feel real, because that would translate into the fight itself feeling real, and it paid off.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Cross platform multiplayer
Multiplayer can be played against all platforms that the game is available on.
Pro User generated maps
Users can build their own maps to play on.
Pro 50 hours of single player gameplay
The single player campaign offers over fifty hours of gameplay.
Pro Classic strategy tabletop gameplay
Battle Worlds: Kronos is a throwback to tabletop strategy gameplay of years past from PC.
Pro EA made the game hyper realistic
They did a great job with the graphics on this one. EA really wanted to fighters to look and feel real, because that would translate into the fight itself feeling real, and it paid off.
Pro Over 250 fighters, both current and non-current
The UFC actually outdid themselves in this regard - they've approached nearly everyone that's ever gone through their system to get their permission to add their likeness to the game.
You also have random fighters that have never been in the UFC, such as Bruce Lee, Mike Tyson, and Bas Rutten. The thinking here was pretty clearly "why not?" and it worked out fabulously.
Cons
Con Game can be difficult
Even though learning the mechanics of the gameplay may be easy enough, mastering how to implement a strategy can be difficult.
Con Ultimate Team Mode is kind of a let down
Ultimate Team Mode was thought to allow players to create their own teams of the best fighters, in order to collect trophies and cards, but in reality all you can do is add custom fighters and go for the title.