When comparing WordPress vs CargoCollective, the Slant community recommends WordPress for most people. In the question“What is the best website builder for a portfolio site?” WordPress is ranked 2nd while CargoCollective is ranked 7th. The most important reason people chose WordPress is:
If you set up WP on your own server, you can change every single aspect of it as you see fit.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Complete control if needed
If you set up WP on your own server, you can change every single aspect of it as you see fit.
Pro Widely used
According to some statistics, WP powers a fifth of the Internet. It means there are resources for everything. Community support, tutorials, extensions and a plethora of customization options.
Pro Self-host & WP-host options
For free WordPress can be hosted by yourself on your own server, or as a subdomain of wordpress.com. You can also pay to use a custom domain with WP hosting.
Pro Open source
Anyone can view the code of WordPress since it's under a libre/open source license.
Pro RSS feeds for everything
Including tags and categories.
Pro Post-level privacy controls
Each post can have a different access level.
Pro Has a built-in video player
Websites built with CargoCollective can use the custom built-in video player. This means that there's no need to upload your videos on Youtube or Vimeo if you want to put them on your portfolio.
Pro Cloud-based image storage
Pro Requires only minimal CSS and HTML knowledge to configure
You can also configure templates to make your website look the way you want it to. For this, it's only required that you know a little HTML and CSS, nothing too advanced.
Pro More than thirty templates available
You can choose between 30+ pre-made templates before building your portfolio website.
Cons
Con A bit of bloat and complexity
WP has grown past being just a blogging platform and as such it's not as lightweight as it used to be. It also considerably more complex due to many more customization options compared to other solutions.
Con Dated
The code is a mess, uses dated conventions, and relies on dated technology.