Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing MelonJS vs Pixi.js, the Slant community recommends Pixi.js for most people. In the question“What are the best HTML5/JavaScript frameworks for web-based games?” Pixi.js is ranked 2nd while MelonJS is ranked 7th. The most important reason people chose Pixi.js is:
Pixi is a WebGL renderer, but can fall back to canvas if WebGL is not supported or turned off.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Good support
Devs help resolve issues in a timely manner and are friendly throughout the process.
Pro Tiled support
Natively integrates Tiled map editor. Tiled is a free, open-source map editor that supports orthogonal, isometric and staggered maps.
Pro Good docs
The documentation is intuitively structured and comprehensive allowing you to quickly find information about the engine.
Pro Has tutorials to help you get started
To understand basics of MelonJS, the developers maintain 2 tutorials that are available on the site.
Pro Javascript (and webGL support in latest version)
Pro Supports WebGL w/ canvas fallback
Pixi is a WebGL renderer, but can fall back to canvas if WebGL is not supported or turned off.
Pro Will be familiar to ActionScript developers
Pixi.js uses a code structure that's very similar to ActionScript.
Cons
Con API breaks all the time
API breaks are common between version changes.
Con Not a complete solution
Pixi only provides the renderer.
