When comparing Futuramo vs TeamWork.com, the Slant community recommends TeamWork.com for most people. In the question“What are the most useful collaboration tools for remote teams?” TeamWork.com is ranked 6th while Futuramo is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose TeamWork.com is:
Tasks are grouped in task lists and can have subtasks. Each task list can be assigned to a particular set of users, aligned with a milestone and have notes. Each task in the task list can have a description, a start and a due date, attachments, priority, manually set progress, followers, dependencies, be assigned to a particular set of users and set to repeat. Each subtask has the same configurable properties except instead of the ability to assign people, subtasks can be commented on.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Free for up to 3 users
Pro Powerful search & sorting features
Easy-to-use filters, smart search and sorting features will help you find what you're looking for.
Pro Real-team collaboration features
Pro Effective collaboration apps for creative teams
Creative teams with multiple client projects might appreciate Futuramo's collaboration apps: Futuramo Tasks, Visual Tickets and Time Tracker.
Pro Prioritization & time estimation
Every task or ticket can be defined using priorities and exact estimation.
Pro Team-oriented & visual-oriented
Feedback is shared visually between members of the team. The tickets are clear and understandable for everyone.
Pro Offers lots of granularity in task management
Tasks are grouped in task lists and can have subtasks. Each task list can be assigned to a particular set of users, aligned with a milestone and have notes. Each task in the task list can have a description, a start and a due date, attachments, priority, manually set progress, followers, dependencies, be assigned to a particular set of users and set to repeat. Each subtask has the same configurable properties except instead of the ability to assign people, subtasks can be commented on.
Pro Each project has only the required functionality
It's possible to limit projects only to the necessary features so that unnecessary functionality doesn't get in the way and clutter up the interface.
Pro Good assortment of features
Gantt charts, calendar and an easy overview of huge amount tasks.
Cons
Con Provides too much detail for small projects
Amount of granularity for tasks can be overwhelming for small projects or teams.