When comparing GoodSync vs TeraCopy, the Slant community recommends TeraCopy for most people. In the question“What are the best GS RichCopy 360 alternatives for Windows? ” TeraCopy is ranked 2nd while GoodSync is ranked 5th. The most important reason people chose TeraCopy is:
It deletes files much much faster than built in Windows file manager.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Integrates into Windows explorer
Pro Multi use beyond ftp
Pro Can create simple to complex automation rule sets
Pro Fast and reliable
Pro Modern UI design
Pro Faster file deletion
It deletes files much much faster than built in Windows file manager.
Pro Can check files for copy errors
TeraCopy can automatically check/verify the copied files for errors, by calculating their CRC or other checksum/hash value.
Pro Seamless shell integration
Pro Skips badly copied files
TeraCopy skips badly copied files during the copying process, and then displays them at the end of the transfer "Verify" with checksum/hash, so you can see which files to re-copy. See also, OpenHashTab for Windows and DeadHash for Windows, Linux, Android.
Cons
Con Sometimes clashes with 7 zip
From my experience, TeraCopy does not do well in conjunction with 7zips.
It seems to error on some systems when you do a drag-and-drop extract.