When comparing Call of Duty: World at War vs Super Hexagon, the Slant community recommends Super Hexagon for most people. In the question“What are the best low-spec PC games?” Super Hexagon is ranked 54th while Call of Duty: World at War is ranked 124th. The most important reason people chose Super Hexagon is:
You will die, a lot, and that is the point. The game is challenging, but fair. It is as much about memorization as it is about precision of movement. This makes for a game that needs to be practiced, quite a bit, which should appeal to those who enjoy working for their achievements.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Great story and multiplayer
Even with not many players you can still have a blast, especially in zombie mode.
Pro Addictively challenging gameplay where "just one more game" is a constant
You will die, a lot, and that is the point. The game is challenging, but fair. It is as much about memorization as it is about precision of movement. This makes for a game that needs to be practiced, quite a bit, which should appeal to those who enjoy working for their achievements.
Pro Aggressive aesthetic that forces the player to adapt to succeed, which keeps the gameplay interesting
The visual design of the game consists of basic geometric shapes in bright colors that turn and blink, all while you are trying to stay focused on a little triangle in the middle. This can be distracting and is by design in order to try to trip up the player in their goal of continuing as long as they can.
Pro Great soundtrack that complements the gameplay perfectly
The soundtrack is done by BossFightSwe, who is very well known for their video game sounds.
Cons
Con Story mode gets pretty repetitive the first time you finish it and you can't play more zombie mode maps unless you add mods
Con May cause nausea
The fast spinning graphics could cause some people a bit of nausea.