Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing FileZilla vs Shellngn - Cloud Based SSH Client, the Slant community recommends Shellngn - Cloud Based SSH Client for most people. In the question“What are the best SSH clients for Windows?” Shellngn - Cloud Based SSH Client is ranked 11th while FileZilla is ranked 16th. The most important reason people chose Shellngn - Cloud Based SSH Client is:
Since this tool is cloud-based, there's no need to download and install anything. You can simpy run it from the browser.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Secure FTP support (FTPS/SFTP)
Supports FTP, FTPS (SSL) and SFTP (SSH).
Pro Free and open source
FileZilla is free open-source software distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License free of charge. Basically this means that everyone, including corporate entities, can use FileZilla, including but not limited to private, educational and commercial use.
Pro Offers Server Mode
Can be used as an FTP server also, allowing easy file sharing.
Pro Cross-platform
In addition to Windows, FileZilla client is available for Unix, OSX and Linux.
Pro Suppots FTP and FTPS
FileZilla Server is a server that supports FTP and FTP over SSL/TLS which provides secure encrypted connections to the server.
Pro Kind of de-facto standard
If you're troubleshooting things, everybody will first try if it works with File-Zilla.
Pro SSH & SFTP in your browser
Since this tool is cloud-based, there's no need to download and install anything. You can simpy run it from the browser.
Pro RDP/VNC Support
Pro Always up to date
Pro Your devices are available on any device
Pro Tunnel support
Pro RDP/VNC In your browser
Remote desktop your servers from the browser.
Pro Telnet Support
Cons
Con Installs junk software on your computer
The installer will install adware by default.
Con Expensive
$3.90 per month
Con Not free
In fact not only not free, but only available at a subscription basis.
Con Sluggish output
It's ok for a quick session, but compared to native apps it's output is slow.
Con Lack of configurability
Not enough options to trim it to your needs.
Con Can't access LAN servers
