When comparing bup vs SpiderOak, the Slant community recommends bup for most people. In the question“What are the best backup programs for Linux?” bup is ranked 11th while SpiderOak is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose bup is:
Data is shared between different incremental backups without having to know which backup is based on which. Even for backups that come from different computers that know nothing about each other. Bup simply saves the minimal amount of data needed.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Saves only the minimum amount of data needed
Data is shared between different incremental backups without having to know which backup is based on which. Even for backups that come from different computers that know nothing about each other. Bup simply saves the minimal amount of data needed.
Pro Huge files can be backed up incrementally
Bup splits up files into different chunks. This is especially useful for large files which can then be stored without using a lot of disk space for different versions of the same file.
Pro Combines cloud syncing, storage service and backup client
Thus you have a single service for all of the things.
Pro Available for many platforms
The Spideroak client is available for Linux, MacOS, Windows, Android and iOS.
Pro Incrementals
SpiderOak updates only that part of the file that has changed, saving bandwidth and time.
Pro Zero knowledge
Data is locally encrypted before uploading to Spideroak. They cannot recover your data even if they wanted to since it is stored in encrypted state on their servers.
Pro Unintrusive
Cons
Con No GUI
Only available as a command line tool.