Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariUseResponse vs Coda
When comparing UseResponse vs Coda, the Slant community recommends Coda for most people. In the question“What are the best hosted internal knowledge base tools for organisations?” Coda is ranked 4th while UseResponse is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose Coda is:
Makes styling a site in CSS simpler.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Multi-language support
Currently supports 10 languages, translation tool available.
Pro Self-hosted option available
It includes unlimited number of users, agents, topics, support of SSL encryption, polls, announcements, and 1 year of support & upgrade. There are also commercial add-ons that can be purchased separately.
Pro Full UI Customization
Easy to configure the interface and the flows
Pro Live Preview mode
Makes styling a site in CSS simpler.
Pro Built-in FTP client
Publishing your changes to the web server is a one-click operation. That is, one click per file, or one click for all your changed files. Or even cherry-pick the files to be published in the next batch.
Pro Built-in support for Git and Subversion
Although the software doesn't ship with these libraries, it does work once you have one installed.
Pro Mature
Coda has been developed by Panic exclusively for Mac since 2007. The experience of the developers shows in the stability and polish of their product.
Pro Many plugins available
There is a huge library of user-created plugins, ranging from additional syntax modes, to code validation and beautification, to reference materials, code snippets, text actions and more.
Cons
Con No free version
Con Hasn't been updated in 2 years.
Con Expensive
The price of $99 is more than many other editors.
