Texts vs Supernotes
When comparing Texts vs Supernotes, the Slant community recommends Supernotes for most people. In the question“What are the best open source Markdown editors for UNIX-like systems?” Supernotes is ranked 28th while Texts is ranked 29th. The most important reason people chose Supernotes is:
The note-card format is incredibly versatile, and great when you have lots of information.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Supports multiple Markdown dialects
Unfortunately, this is a global setting for save (it can open any dialect)

Pro Immediate Markdown rendering and preview
Texts immediately renders the formatted Markdown as you are typing it inside the text box. It's quite similar to a WYSIWYG editor.

Pro Imports and exports many formats
HTML, Word, TeX, PDF, ePUB, OPML.
Pro Works on Mac OS X and Windows
Pro Short-form note-cards
The note-card format is incredibly versatile, and great when you have lots of information.
Pro Responsive platform
Works on all devices, from mobiles to laptops.
Pro Full Markdown (with LaTeX equation) support
Great to be able to use all the features of Markdown, rather than a select few.
Cons
Con Overwrites standard Markdown
Editing a preexisting Markdown document overwrites standard markup in it (for example, interpreting headings marked with leading "#"s and rewriting them with a trailing underscore line), adds extra blank lines between all paragraphs, and adds extra spaces at the head of unordered-list items.
Con Spell checking is not activated by default
There's a built-in spell checker which is not activated by default and is quite hidden.
Con Limited choice of built-in themes
You can download the CSS for these themes and create your own, but would be nice to have more flavors (e.g. GitHub)
Con No word count in older versions
Word count is present in Texts 0.21, at least.
Con Only web apps for now
The developers haven't released native apps yet.
