Drag vs TeamWork.com
When comparing Drag vs TeamWork.com, the Slant community recommends TeamWork.com for most people. In the question“What is the best task management software for small teams?” TeamWork.com is ranked 6th while Drag is ranked 28th. The most important reason people chose TeamWork.com is:
Tasks are grouped in task lists and can have subtasks. Each task list can be assigned to a particular set of users, aligned with a milestone and have notes. Each task in the task list can have a description, a start and a due date, attachments, priority, manually set progress, followers, dependencies, be assigned to a particular set of users and set to repeat. Each subtask has the same configurable properties except instead of the ability to assign people, subtasks can be commented on.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Workflow Management
Drag is more than a Shared Inbox. Besides bringing shared inboxes into Gmail, it also allows teams to organize and manage their workflows across different stages in a Kanban (Trello-like) view.
Pro Emails + Tasks
Most shared inbox tools allow team to collaborate only on emails. With Drag, both emails and tasks can be managed equally by teams.
Pro Seamlessly integrated into Gmail
No brainer for G Suite users! Drag integrates seamlessly to the place teams already spend most of their time: Gmail.
Pro Managing sales and support from inside Gmail
Good for shared inbox and managing sales and support from inside Gmail
Pro Kanban view
Drag is super visual with kanban boards like Trello. Great to keep teams on the same page always.
Pro Lovely UI
Drag just feels right, the team did a great job with their UI.
Pro Offers lots of granularity in task management
Tasks are grouped in task lists and can have subtasks. Each task list can be assigned to a particular set of users, aligned with a milestone and have notes. Each task in the task list can have a description, a start and a due date, attachments, priority, manually set progress, followers, dependencies, be assigned to a particular set of users and set to repeat. Each subtask has the same configurable properties except instead of the ability to assign people, subtasks can be commented on.
Pro Each project has only the required functionality
It's possible to limit projects only to the necessary features so that unnecessary functionality doesn't get in the way and clutter up the interface.
Pro Good assortment of features
Gantt charts, calendar and an easy overview of huge amount tasks.
Cons
Con No mobile app
They are launching a Gmail add-on but do not have standalone mobile app for Android or iOS.
Con Provides too much detail for small projects
Amount of granularity for tasks can be overwhelming for small projects or teams.